SSL

Who makes more money? CW or AD?

Happy as pie to be here wink

Technorati Tags:

i am an art direction student and wondering who makes more money? I actually love doing both (well, I like design but love writing too, but choose AD as my discipline) and was curious. I heard long time ago that AD*s make more money, is that right? Hence my decision to get into AD, instead of CW.



thanks guys



Mouse

AFAIK Copywriters make more money as they commonly climb further up the ladder than AD*s. That is, copywriters become Creative Directors, Copywriters become seniors faster and you can*t spit these days without finding a decent designer who might do as an AD in a pinch.



In other words, CW*s make more money.



If yyou*re choosing your title based on what future salaries might bring I kinda wonder if you*re any good at either. But that*s just me.

If you*re really only interested in money, try media.


I don*t know about the long term, from what I*ve heard ADs make a little more at the same level as a CW.



But their job tends to require more hours and is much more actual work involved. Unless you have design and production people to lighten your load.



But I*m a CW, what the heck do I know?

Hi Da Bitch and the rest who kindly replied.



I see where you are coming from, but maybe you are jumping to conclusions too soon about my decision to choose AD over CW. I really like both (despite what you think, Da Bitch and have a knack for words and writing, always have and love design and have been artistic all my life) and was wondering who makes more money. Yes, I know that one should NOT get into a particular field because of the money ONLY, but I had heard (maybe misinformation) years ago that CW*s make considerably much less than AD*s and I really do like both disciplines (and have known many who switched disciplines midway or who do a bit of both, post graduation or like Neil French, who I heard does both) and after many years of making yearly salaries of 20 grand, I want to make sure that in the next 10 years (all this busting my a** in school and in agencies that I won*t be making the same range.) I know I am exaggerating, but we all want to make money, no? I mean, you have to give me a break because if I really wanted to make a TON of money, I would not be a creative (I would have become a boring lawyer or doctor LOL), but I don*t want to starve either. And I am well aware that in the beginning, I won*t be making (if hired anywhere) more than 30 grand a year, maybe even less than what I am making now! But I want to make sure I am making a good salary and since I love both disciplines (Dabitch, I dont think it was nice of you to assume I can*t be good at both or that i have a double talent for both), I was trying to figure out what would be the best for me.



Geez, sorry I asked. LOL But thanks anyways for those who did answer my question. smile



psst. it*s dabitch...not Da Bitch. eek



And then again the whole money thing varies depending on your sex too. But that*s all hush hush. wink



Perhaps a better way to make the decision is if a gun was put to your head and you had to pick between the two, which would you go for?



Just because you choose the path of AD dosen*t mean you can become a CD. People do it. It can be tough, but it*s not unusual. Or vise versa. Or evetually you do both like you said.



Honestly I think the monetary differences between the two are minor and not worthwhile for using them as the deciding factor.

Thanks CaffeineGoddess.



I loved your answer. Makes alot of sense. I guess I can eventually decide years down the road, as I gain experience in an agency, if I want to pursue one or the other. I just worried because lately, I was thinking of switching disciplines in school because I looooove writing also but was weary since hearing that CW*s make alot alot less and my impression was that they are on the bottom of the totem pole, but I realize now that without an AW, there would be no CW and vice versa, as they depend on each other and are both just as important, so I hope they are compensated equally?? smile Some have said that CW*s make alot more, but I guess it depends on the agency as well, probably. I will take your advice though and not let salary be the deciding factor. I will do what I feel is "better" for me. thnx!



I have never met a team that didn*t have the exact same salary. I have never worked in a team where I didn*t make exactly as much - no more, no less - than my writer. I won*t make sweeping generalisations about how it might be over in the United states though. I don*t even know where you might be looking to begin your career MouseyMouse. Is it in a country where English is the main language?



However, I have also never had a Creative Director who once was an Art Director, so I stand by my ladder-knowledge. AFAIK, writers get promoted more often and faster and this is what brings them up to higher salaries. I*m not saying that it is impossble for an AD to become a great CD - Paul Arden comes to mind - it*s just not as common.



And if you do love writing, one would think that you would take note of how other people spell their surnames before assuming that is is two words instead. But again, that*s probably just me.

Cheers.



>>But thanks anyways for those who did answer my question.



You*re welcome.


>> And then again the whole money thing varies depending on your sex >> too. But that*s all hush hush. wink



Sex? You mean gender don*t you? wink



Sex is not the answer. Sex is the question. The answer is "yes".



sorry, Valentines day in Swedish means "day for Art Directors to mock writers".

hahahah well, it is advertising after all. Don*t we all wear black and sleep with each other to gain...ahem...position in the agency? wink

Dabitch is right. Although I*ve had some prior ADs as CDs more than half have been CWs.



According to TalentZoo*s salary calculator, both positions get the same range. So unless your title is different, jr, sr, etc...in theory you should be making the same dosh.

caffeinegoddess* touches on a valid points. The difference between AD and CW salaries is never as large as the difference between male and female AD & CW salaries.

No, Da Biaatch..... that WAS my intention. Meoooowww! Purr Purr.







eek

How original. With fresh thinking like that you*ll go far. And make tons of money.

wink I*m just yanking your tail MouseyMouse. I just don*t think name-gags are very funny after having heard every possible variation until the end of time.



A mouse that purrs by the way? There*s a new one. Hadn*t seen that before. *pets purring mouse*



As for choosing gigs. I say try Copywriter. mainly because I regret I didn*t do it. The grass does seem greener there but then again, isn*t it always on the other side of the fence?




On a serious note, I don*t think it*s right to bash people and assume things if you don*t know them. You seem way overly critical. To assume that someone must not be talented if they are asking about salaries? So you would do ads for free, pro bono for the rest of your life, if you could right? and work at Mc Donald*s to pay the bills. come on.... and to assume that anyone who is NEW to this forum, to know that your handle name is a REAL NAME ? I just thought it was a joke, so lighten up. I have heard of several Swedish and Scandinavian surnames before but never Dabitch. I just thought that was your handle and a cool handle. So you instantly assume I would know that, right? So that does not make me perceptive and a good writer. Ugh !!



Later, and thnx again for your input as much as some parts irritated me. LOL

PS - I think all creatives have a talent for both skills. It*s just most are stronger in one direction - words or visuals. The best teams are made up of wordy Art Directors and visually inclined CopyWriters.



all in my humble opinion of course.

>> On a serious note, I don*t think it*s right to bash people and assume

>> things if you don*t know them.



Neither do I, but you started it. For future ref, you can click peoples names and see their own presentation pages. Mine states my name and asks people not to bother cracking jokes about it.

Ok, thnx Dabitch. smile



I can bury the hachet with you. hehe. Your info and feedback has been super helpful. Thanks for explaining yourself and for seeming nice enough to want to write to clear things up. haha.



That was cool of you. and thnx to all who wrote replies. I love this forum and this site.



Best wishes,



Mousey mouse.



No worries MouseyMouse. See you around, and let us know how it goes with MouseyMouse*s Choice aye?



(ok that didn*t sound at all like Sophies choice I suck at cracking jokes at this hour. Meh.)

thanks very much, DB. (that is ok, right?) hehe



I will keep you posted. by the way, LOOOOOVE your space man/astronaut mural over your sofa! Can you do one for me too?? smile by the way, you had asked where I was. I live in the States.



Nitey Nite. smile

Hehe, thanks. (and yep DB and dab is ok)



I think Caff and Norwalk77 know better than me how the whole team-thing goes over in the states. work-wise I mean.




I*ve never worked at an agency with set teams. Unless the place was so small there were no options for switching teams around.



I*ve also never even applied to a job as part of a team, so I have no idea how team salaries work.



And most of my CDs started out as ADs. Though most of the agency owners I*ve worked for started out as CWs.



Hope this helps and good luck with your decision.



Definitely the inestimable caffeinegoddess got it right with the gun-to-head scenario.



The fact of the matter is, the best way to make money, either as CW or AD is to be really really good. And to be really really good you have to love what you*re doing.



As to your potential for career advancement, it*s true that there*s a bias toward CWs as CDs, but I think this is often to do with the the observation {HORRENDOUS GENERALISTAION ALERT!!] that copywriters tend to be more mouthy than art directors - tend to talk more in meetings, get into more fights in the corridor etc. There are of course about a billion exceptions, but even my creative director (a former CW) has coined the termed SAD (Silent Art Director) syndrome for what he sees going on in presentations, and it certainly holds true with 9 out of the 11 teams here.



As a result, the sad fact seems to be that most management can see the skill set a copwriter has (talking, being a pain in the arse, talking some more) transferring to a CD position easier than they can see that of an art director.



So the moral is, if you*re articulate enough, if you show yourself to have not just talent but people-management skills and a good grasp of debate, then a CD position is within your reach no matter what your discipline. Plus, there also seems to be a trend for Joint Creative Directors - at least here, where quite a few of our major agencies have BOTH a CW and an AD as Creative dept heads. Which, personally, I like to work under because you can treat them like your mum and dad - go to one of them for one thing and the other for another. Play them off against each other. Liberally use the phrase "But HE said I could..." Great scope for mayhem ensues...

Hey guys



Your info has been so greatly appreciated. So highly informative.



I have one more question. I decided to talk to my teachers last night after class, one copywriter and art director, and I was trying to find out where they think I belong, as I am now having doubts (being that I do like both art direction and writing, whether I am good is a different story, haha..... but I am very visual and quirky.) about my discipline in school. I am highly visual, but I am not good at Creative Suite and lay out software (I can learn, but am not too crazy about it.).



Do art directors need to be competent in those skills? Silly me, when I first got into advertising school, I always assumed, the art director layed it out on paper, came up with the way the ad would look and "someone" else, would comp it up on the computer! LOL Duh.....



So I have no problem drawing them out, laying them out nicely on paper, but find most computer software programs like Photoshop boring. Is that enough to make one want to become a copywriter instead? Do copywriters need to become proficient in those programs too?



By the way, I want to make sure most of you understand, I don*t mind software programs like Photoshop and Illustrator, In Design, etc.... they can be fun, but to do it all the time? I heard AD*s spend alot of time working on the final products, countless hours, overtime, etc..... is that true? I am sort of confused. And I have worked with these programs and they are fun but at the same time, difficult. I mean, I could learn them so that I could become a pro, but in class, I got frustrated with the software and started to wonder if I would enjoy AD. And now that I discovered I really like writing (well, I always knew but had to choose ONE discipline in school), i am confused even more. frown By the way, one more clarification. I ALWAYS was artistic and loved to draw, paint, etc.... and when I decided on advertising years ago, when I first got the itch to try it, I was always in awe at how most ads are designed, the colorfulness of them, the layouts, etc...... and even though I love the slogans that went with them, I assumed that since I am more "visual", I would want to get into art direction. Hopefully, that makes sense to you all.



Any feedback would be so appreciated. Thnx.



Mousey



I think most ADs would prefer us CWs never learn those programs. wink



I kid. Actually, CWs really have no need for learning those programs. All you need is word, or some such program and you*re set.



ADs on the other hand, do.

Until you get to a much more senior position, for the most part you will be responsible for using those programs to layout your ads and make them ready for printing, etc.



It*s usually only the more senior folks who hand over their sketches to a designer or art director lower on the totem poll to do the mac work. If you get a job at a small agency, you*re even more likely to have to be able to have these skills at any level.



Perhaps in the olden days ADs didn*t have to worry about such things, but I think now if you applied for an AD job without knowing how to use the required software, you might get laughed at.



Then again, I*m a copywriter, so what do I know grin

And I have a basic understanding of Photoshop, Dreamweaver and the like (although Illustrator is still a total mystery to me).



One thing that you might want to consider is how are you planning on putting your book together. I learned these programs so that I could work on spec ads for my book back in school.



And there*s nothing wrong with being visual and a copywriter. I think of myself as a visual copywriter.



_________________

<a href=http//caffeinegoddess.blogspot.com>Cup of Java</a>- strong, full-bodied, and freshly brewed.

Seriously, dude, you are asking all the wrong questions. First it*s how much money can I make and now it*s how much will I have to use "boring" software?



It*s great that you can draw, but it*s really not at all an important part of an Art Director*s skill set. A good AD is someone who has good ideas, and a good idea can often be communicated (to your partner or to your CD) using matchstick men. Communicating that same idea to your clients is a different matter. For better or worse, industry standard is tending towards the use of InDesign or whatever in the creation of your presentation roughs - if the finished product is not going to be a drawing, there are many clients who do not have the imagination to make the leap from drawing to photography or whatever.



And unless you are the first junior ever to be given an assistant, at some point you*re going to have to use the computer anyway.



So, yes, learn the programmes. All your peers will have at least a working knowledge of them. They are your tools, they are part of your craft.



But most importantly, and here*s the tough love bit, stop bloody worrying about the details of your future job and concentrate on being good enough to get one. Maybe you will be the greatest ad genius of all time at some point, but right now you really haven*t earned the right to be sniffy about what you*re going to be doing in your first few years of actual employment.



Sorry if I sound harsh, but you*re going to get a short sharp shock when you do get a job if you go in with unrealistic expectations. That*s if you DO get a job at all - most creative directors are just as impressed by diligence and a willingness to learn as by a good book with a few nice spec ads.



John,



It*s ok. I understand where you are coming from. I really do. I am worrying about all those details way too early, but it*s just that I wanted to make sure I get into the right discipline in school. I find it hard to explain myself, sorry.

frown But I am not offended by your criticism. I need it! LOL



What i am saying is that I am very visual (whether I will great at this remains to be seen, so I am not being cocky) and i love writing. I know copywriters have to be visual and love visuals too, even if they only do headlines and copy. My teacher was telling me that a great copywriter HAS to be visual because they have to work with an AD and throw ideas back and forth and if that copy writer is not visual, it*s only one sided? ) and I love coming up with visual aspects of ads, but I dont know if I will enjoy all it entails with the computer programs and all and laying it out. I mean, I could learn them. I have done stuff on photoshop that amazed me and it can be fun. I don*t know. I am confused!!! LOL but I guess I will decide for myself after talking to both teachers and learning what their professions entail. I just know that I LOVE advertising! smile I guess initially I was drawn to the visual aspect of ads, especially print and alternative media, and I wanted to be one of those people who designed that sort of clever stuff. You see where I am coming from? From a purely visual perspective. But then I realize that it does take alot, its complicated and you have to learn alot of stuff. I guess I can learn it. Maybe I am just giving up because it all LOOKS complicated. That is my guess at this point. I get threatened easily if I find stuff too complicated.



But then again, I really love writing too. I will decide eventually. I know learning software takes time and those are the instuments that ARt Directors use. I have to keep that in mind.





I appreciate all the feedback you both gave me and I am not at all turned off. Thanks again.



Mousey.







Partly to play devil*s advocate, but I think it*s good MM is thinking ahead. I*ve read lots of posts from aspiring juniors who want both jobs and think they can be a little team within themselves. It*s refreshing to hear someone who*s taking the choice seriously.



Plus I decided to be a copywriter for a silly reason.



I was working with a partner during an internship I got purely out of dumb luck. And for some reason I ended up being the one to flip through the font book when we were executing an ad. It bored the crap out of me. I decided right then I would be a CW. And honestly, I think if I had tried to *tough it out* to be an AD, I*d be working at a mortgage processing center right now.



But keep in mind, while being a CW isn*t as technical, there are still lots of little details. Like MM keeps typing "alot". I*ve seen interns get fired for making lesser mistakes. It*s "a lot".



I*m the kind of person who*s like, oh yeah, well, you get my drift. But as a writer you have to get into the craft of writing. Of sentence stucture and even boring spelling.



Anyway, this is a fun thread. Glad this all got started.

If it*s money you care about, may I suggest a job in the Finance industry?



Whether you choose CW or AD, you*re gonna spend the first half of your career grossly underpaid...only to receive the salary you deserve during the second half of your career. And that*s assuming you don*t get laid off somewhere along the way, or end up shilling shite in some agency*s retail group. The real salaries are reserved for the lucky ones who managed to get the good work through.



Seriously, advertising, as a money making career, really isn*t worth the hassle nowadays. So if it*s money you*re looking for, go out, buy some suits, cufflinks, and a few pairs of loafers, and try to make it trading bonds or something.



Only do advertising if you absolutely must.

If it*s money you care about, may I suggest a job in the Finance industry?



Whether you choose CW or AD, you*re gonna spend the first half of your career grossly underpaid...only to receive the salary you deserve during the second half of your career. And that*s assuming you don*t get laid off somewhere along the way, or end up shilling shite in some agency*s retail group. The real salaries are reserved for the lucky ones who managed to get the good work through.



Seriously, advertising, as a money making career, really isn*t worth the hassle nowadays. So if it*s money you*re looking for, go out, buy some suits, cufflinks, and a few pairs of loafers, and try to make it trading bonds or something.



Only do advertising if you absolutely must.

hey there,



Thanks for the info and talking about your own personal experience. I am starting to think that my idea of what an art director does maybe was a bit skewed? (Mind you, I am early in my ad school education). I am starting to see a bit of that as I think about it now. I really love visuals but love writing also. But if I were to become an art director, even though I love the way an ad "looks", I am not sure if I want to be the one "doing it" or executing it. Maybe, maybe not. I could also be threatened by the apparent initially difficulty with the software that I have encountered at the school. Maybe my choice of words, like "boring" is not how I would describe it, but tedious and difficult........ but I do love coming up with those visuals that I enjoy when doing my "marker comps" in class. Those I truly love to do. smile



I do see what you are saying about alot and a lot, haha......... but I would proof read everything before actually turning it in. I am usually VERY GOOD at grammar. Depends on who I am writing for (IM*s, forums, etc.) where I relax a bit and use abbreviations like "thnx" etc. But i would not think of using that in an ad. ha.



Well, I am going to get some feedback from my art direction teacher (he works in a good agency) and ask him what he thinks. I will let u all know what he says.



Thanks again



Mousey


">>

>>I do see what you are saying about alot and a lot, haha......... but I >would proof read everything before actually turning it in. I am usually >VERY GOOD at grammar. Depends on who I am writing for (IM*s, forums, >etc.) where I relax a bit and use abbreviations like "thnx" etc. But i would >not think of using that in an ad. ha."





I*m totally the same way. Just using it as an example of how both sides of being a creative can get all uptight and nit picky. Nothing personal, I swear.



And I want to add that if you can take all the critisim you*ve gotten today and still keep your chin up and focused on your goal, you might be a realy good candidate for being a creative. It*s a harsh world, and a thick skin like yours comes in mighty handy.



ha, thanks NOrwalk!



Glad you see it that way. I can take constructive criticism, so i guess that*s a good thing.



I will all keep you updated as to what I decide.



Mousey

Quote
John,





MouseyMouse. Mousey. The Mousemeister. MM. MouseMan. Mousie-san. Mouse-say. MoMo.



I hate to the be the second one to bring this up since you didn*t take to well to having it pointed out before, but I suggest you chill on the presumptuous shortening of peoples handles/nicks. Not all Michales like to be called Mike, unless they say it*s OK. johndoom is not a John, not even close. Please take this as the friendly advice it is intended to be.



Thanks



I will keep that in mind, but with all fairness, I did not know Dabitch was a real name and thought it was just a cool handle but my fault for not looking at her profile. We have since made amends. smile But I do see your point. I do want to say I was not being disrespectful at all with people*s Handle names. It did not occur to me that I might be offending them, as we all think differently (I would NOT be offended if someone replied back to me as "Mouse", but that*s me) but I will keep that in mind because assuming is not good, if you are not sure, how that person wants to be addressed.



Thanks,



Mousey

>>A mouse that purrs by the way? There*s a new one. Hadn*t seen that before.



It*s MM*s own version of the Cadbury easter bunny. But what could a purring mouse sell confused

The one who has the most passion.

sellsius wins! welcome to the forum mate.